Dike

Dike

A compliance gateway that turns EU AI Act obligations into audit-ready evidence

Paid
4.9 (7 reviews)

Gallery

About Dike

Dike is a compliance gateway for teams shipping AI products into the European Union. It sits between your application and whatever model provider you call, and it turns the paperwork the EU AI Act demands, meaning audit-grade logging, human-oversight records, and incident reporting, into something that happens automatically instead of something your engineers have to build from scratch over several months.

The problem it targets is specific and getting sharper. The AI Act puts real obligations on anyone deploying AI in the EU, and a lot of those obligations come down to proof. You need records that show what your system did, that a human was in the loop where required, and that you can report an incident inside a fixed window. Most teams either bolt this together by hand or discover the gap only when an auditor asks. Dike's pitch is blunt about that, promising everything the auditor will ask for and nothing your team has to build.

Mechanically it works as a proxy in front of your model calls. You change a single line, the base URL your OpenAI-style SDK points at, so requests flow through Dike on the way to providers like OpenAI, Azure, or a local Ollama instance. There's no new SDK to adopt and no rewrite of your app. As each request passes through, the gateway runs its compliance checks in-flight, and the company reports a median overhead of well under a millisecond, so the added latency is negligible in practice.

Inside that pass-through a lot happens. Dike redacts personal data like names, card numbers, and IDs before they reach the model, blocks calls that look like prompt injection or other malicious input, routes requests that need a person's sign-off into a human-oversight queue with tracked approvals, and marks AI-generated content. Every event is written into a hash-chained, tamper-evident audit record aimed squarely at the Act's Article 12 logging requirement, and retrieval-augmented and chatbot setups are covered too, with the document-retrieval steps tracked as part of the trail.

It also handles the part nobody wants to think about until it's too late. When something goes wrong, Dike gives you incident case management with the regulatory clock built in, including the fifteen-day reporting timeline tied to Article 73, so the deadline is tracked rather than missed. Storage stays inside the EU for GDPR reasons, with configurable retention, and the gateway is built fail-open, meaning that if the audit store is unreachable your traffic still passes through instead of going down.

The throughline across all of it is evidence. Each of these functions exists because the Act tends to ask not just whether you did the right thing but whether you can prove it after the fact, and a tamper-evident, time-ordered log is exactly the kind of artifact an auditor or regulator expects to see. By capturing that record as a side effect of traffic that's already flowing through the gateway, Dike lets a team stay compliant without standing up a separate logging pipeline, a redaction service, and an incident tracker as three more systems to own and maintain.

The obvious audience is EU-based AI product teams and companies that fall under the AI Act, especially smaller ones that can't spare months of engineering to stand up a compliance layer. For a small company, the realistic alternative is weeks or months of internal work to design the log schema, wire up redaction, build an approval flow, and set up incident tracking, all before writing a line of the actual product. Dike's argument is that most of that is undifferentiated plumbing every regulated AI team needs and none of them should have to reinvent. The framing throughout is that this should feel routine, described as one base-URL change with everything in between kept as evidence, and wiring it in is pitched as easier than adding analytics. That positioning is what separates it from heavyweight governance suites, since the entire onboarding is a config change rather than a project.

On access, Dike is in a closed beta that's free to join through a request form, with paid plans lined up behind it. The published tiers are a Starter plan at forty-nine euros a month for ten thousand traces and an Enterprise plan at one hundred ninety-nine euros a month for a hundred thousand traces, plus a custom option for unlimited volume. It's an early-stage product rather than a decade-old incumbent, but it's a working gateway with concrete pricing and a clear posture, and the team can be reached directly at hello@d1k3.com for beta access or questions.

Key Features

  • Drop-in proxy via one base-URL change
  • Automatic PII redaction
  • Prompt-injection and malicious-call blocking
  • Hash-chained tamper-evident audit trail
  • Human-oversight approval routing
  • Incident case management with reporting clock

Pros & Cons

What we like

  • Wires in with a single config change
  • Sub-millisecond median added latency
  • EU-only storage with configurable retention
  • Fail-open design keeps traffic flowing

Room for improvement

  • No permanent free tier beyond the closed beta
  • Scope is narrowed to EU AI Act compliance
  • Early-stage product still in closed beta
  • Requires routing model calls through a gateway

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Dike?
Dike is a compliance gateway for AI products sold in the EU. It proxies your model calls and automatically produces the audit logs, human-oversight records, and incident reporting the EU AI Act requires, so your team doesn't have to build that layer itself.
How do you set up Dike?
You change one line, the base URL your OpenAI-style SDK points at, so requests flow through Dike to providers like OpenAI, Azure, or Ollama. There's no new SDK and no app rewrite, and the reported median overhead is well under a millisecond.
Is Dike free?
It's currently free to join through a closed beta. The published paid plans are a Starter tier at forty-nine euros a month for ten thousand traces and an Enterprise tier at one hundred ninety-nine euros a month for a hundred thousand traces, with a custom option for unlimited volume.
Who is Dike for?
EU-based teams and companies shipping AI products that fall under the AI Act, especially smaller teams that can't spare months of engineering to build compliance logging, PII redaction, and incident reporting on their own.

Best For

Meeting EU AI Act audit-logging requirementsRedacting personal data before it hits a modelTracking human sign-off on sensitive AI requestsManaging an AI incident inside the reporting window

Featured in

Alternatives to Dike

View all

Reviews (7)

D
Diego Kobayashi Verified

Two months in, no regrets

Started using Dike casually, now it is pinned in my dock. The hash-chained tamper-evident audit trail is more useful than I expected. No regrets so far.

3/17/2026 13 found this helpful
Q
Quinn Brown Verified

Genuinely impressed

Came to Dike after getting frustrated with what I had before. The human-oversight approval routing is more useful than I expected. Worth it for what I get out of it.

6/14/2026 12 found this helpful
M
Morgan Nielsen Verified

Quietly excellent

Three months of Dike later, here is what holds up. Their take on human-oversight approval routing is genuinely good. It just works, day after day, without surprises.

3/10/2026 10 found this helpful
L
Louis Karlsson

Genuinely impressed

Tried Dike on a side project first, then rolled it out everywhere. Where it really wins is sub-millisecond median added latency. Mostly using it for redacting personal data before it hits a model. Easy yes for anyone weighing the same trade offs.

6/1/2026 9 found this helpful
M
Maya Nair Verified

Exactly what I needed

Have been running Dike for a while, here is where I land. What stands out is how it handles drop-in proxy via one base-url change.

5/28/2026 8 found this helpful
L
Lucas Singh Verified

Finally something that fits

Found Dike on a Show HN thread and I am glad I clicked. Their take on automatic pii redaction is genuinely good. The interface stays out of my way, which I appreciate. Recommending it to people in a similar spot.

5/6/2026 5 found this helpful
D
Drew Weber

Finally something that fits

Dike has quietly become part of my daily flow. The automatic pii redaction is more useful than I expected. It does what it says, which is rarer than it should be. Found it works best for managing an ai incident inside the reporting window. It earns its place in my stack.

4/11/2026 1 found this helpful