T

Textcaster

Self-hostable social timeline built entirely on RSS feeds and open standards

Open Source
4.4 (7 reviews)

Gallery

About Textcaster

Textcaster, also known as RSC (Really Simple Conversations), is a federated social platform that treats every post as an RSS feed entry. Instead of building yet another proprietary social network, it uses open web standards so your content stays portable and readable by any RSS client. You can follow people, have threaded conversations, and join communities, all without locking your data into a platform that might disappear or change its rules.

The problem it addresses is the familiar one of social media lock-in. The platforms you use today hold your posts, your connections, and your history. If they shut down, change policies, or just make the experience worse, you lose everything. Textcaster flips that by making your feed the thing you own. Posts, replies, and full conversation threads travel as RSS, which means federation between instances works without any proprietary protocol. Anyone can read your feed, whether they use Textcaster or just a feed reader.

Under the hood, the architecture is straightforward. Each instance runs independently, but instances can see and interact with each other through RSS. When you follow someone on another instance, you're subscribing to their feed. When you reply, your reply appears in the conversation thread and shows up in their feed reader too. The threading model keeps conversations intact across servers, which is what makes it feel like a social network rather than a collection of blogs.

Who it's for is self-hosting enthusiasts, independent writers, and communities that value data ownership over polish. If you're comfortable running your own server or want to join a small instance run by people you trust, Textcaster gives you a social experience without the trade-offs of centralized platforms. It's not trying to compete with Twitter or Threads on scale or features. It's for people who've decided the trade-offs aren't worth it.

What makes it different from other federated networks is the simplicity of the underlying standard. ActivityPub and similar protocols are powerful but complex. RSS is old, boring, and universally supported. That means federation comes almost for free, and you can always export your data to something else because it's just feeds.

The software is open source and free to use. Multiple public instances are already running, and you can join one or spin up your own. There's no paid tier because the point is ownership, not monetization.

Key Features

  • RSS-native post architecture
  • Cross-instance federation
  • Threaded conversation support
  • Full data export via feeds
  • Multi-session account support
  • Self-hostable server

Pros & Cons

What we like

  • Posts are portable because they're just RSS
  • Federation works without proprietary protocols
  • Open source and free to self-host
  • No platform lock-in or algorithmic feed

Room for improvement

  • Smaller network than mainstream platforms
  • Requires self-hosting or trusting an instance
  • Simpler feature set than full social networks
  • Less discoverability without algorithmic surfacing

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Textcaster?
Textcaster is a federated social platform where every post is an RSS feed entry. Conversations thread across instances using open standards, so you can follow people, reply, and export your data without being locked into a proprietary network.
Is Textcaster free?
Yes. The software is open source and free to use. You can join an existing public instance or self-host your own. There's no paid tier because the project prioritizes ownership over monetization.
How does federation work?
Each Textcaster instance exposes posts as RSS feeds. When you follow someone on another instance, you're subscribing to their feed. Replies and threads travel through RSS too, so conversations can span multiple independent servers.
Who is Textcaster for?
It's built for people who want social features without platform lock-in. Self-hosters, independent bloggers, and communities that value data ownership over scale. If you're comfortable running a server or joining a small instance, Textcaster fits.

Best For

Running a community on open infrastructurePublishing posts that stay portable foreverFollowing people via RSS without an accountSelf-hosting a social timeline you control

Featured in

Alternatives to Textcaster

View all

Reviews (7)

B
Bjorn Lindqvist Verified

Finally something that fits

Came to Textcaster after getting frustrated with what I had before. Their take on rss-native post architecture is genuinely good. The thing I keep coming back to is how reliable it is. Worth it for what I get out of it.

4/18/2026 14 found this helpful
P
Priya Greco Verified

Pulled its weight from week one

Textcaster has quietly become part of my daily flow. Their take on federation works without proprietary protocols is genuinely good. Support actually answered when I had a question, which surprised me. Glad I made the switch.

7/19/2026 13 found this helpful
N
Nneka Leroy Verified

Pulled its weight from week one

Have been running Textcaster for a while, here is where I land. It handles the boring parts so I can focus on the work that matters. Support actually answered when I had a question, which surprised me. Recommending it to people in a similar spot.

7/14/2026 11 found this helpful
Q
Quinn Almeida

Recommended without reservation

Came to Textcaster after getting frustrated with what I had before. It just works, day after day, without surprises. Mostly using it for following people via rss without an account. Worth it for what I get out of it.

5/5/2026 7 found this helpful
F
Freya Johnson Verified

Genuinely impressed

Picked Textcaster for the price, stayed for the quality. The rss-native post architecture is more useful than I expected. The interface stays out of my way, which I appreciate. Mostly using it for running a community on open infrastructure. Easy yes for anyone weighing the same trade offs.

7/12/2026 6 found this helpful
S
Soren Weber Verified

Recommended without reservation

Textcaster solves a real problem for me without making a fuss about it. Support actually answered when I had a question, which surprised me. Found it works best for running a community on open infrastructure. Easy yes for anyone weighing the same trade offs.

6/8/2026 6 found this helpful
M
Marco Costa

It just works

Hadn't planned on switching, but Textcaster was hard to ignore. It slotted into my routine without much fuss. It earns its place in my stack.

6/21/2026 5 found this helpful