TrustLoop
Runtime control system that intercepts AI agent actions before they cause irreversible side effects
Gallery
About TrustLoop
TrustLoop is a runtime guard layer that sits between AI agents and the external systems they interact with. It intercepts proposed actions, evaluates them against policies, and returns explicit decisions before execution occurs. The decisions include permit, deny, transform, require approval, or defer, each accompanied by reasoning that explains why the action was allowed or blocked. This is not another prompting technique or fine-tuning approach. It is a hard boundary at the execution layer where every side effect passes through a checkpoint before reaching users, tools, or payment systems.
The problem it addresses is consequential and growing. Production AI agents can shell out commands, send emails, trigger payments, call APIs, and interact with external services. Without a hard boundary, a single bad output can send the wrong email to the wrong person, burn through an API budget in minutes, execute a dangerous system command, or authorize a payment that should have been blocked. Prompt-based guardrails help, but they live inside the same context window the agent controls. A clever prompt injection or a poorly scoped system message can bypass them. TrustLoop operates at a separate runtime boundary where policies are evaluated on proposed actions, not on the agent's reasoning about what it might do. The check happens after the agent decides but before anything irreversible occurs.
Under the hood the system provides decision receipts, essentially audit trails that document what was proposed, what decision was made, and why the policy engine reached that conclusion. These receipts are cryptographically verifiable, which matters for compliance scenarios, post-incident reviews, and demonstrating to auditors that controls were in place. The policies themselves can be defined in durable context rather than relying on the transient state of a conversation. This means spending caps, command allowlists, communication rules, and approval thresholds persist across sessions and apply consistently regardless of how the agent reached its decision.
TrustLoop ships SDKs for TypeScript, Python, and Rust, so integrating it into an existing agent stack requires wrapping the action dispatch calls rather than rewriting the agent architecture. The pattern is straightforward. Before your agent executes an action, it sends the proposed action to TrustLoop. TrustLoop evaluates the proposal against your policies and returns a decision. If the decision is permit, the action proceeds. If the decision is deny or transform, the agent handles the result accordingly. If the decision is require approval, the system can route to a human reviewer before continuing. This model keeps the control layer separate from the intelligence layer, so upgrades to either do not break the other.
The Rust runtime is self-hostable, meaning teams can deploy it within their own infrastructure if data residency or latency is a concern. There is no requirement to send action proposals to a third-party service if that does not fit your security posture. You run the service, you own the logs, and you control the policy definitions.
The target audience is development teams running AI agents in production who need guardrails against uncontrolled spending, dangerous shell commands, unauthorized outbound communication, or any action where a mistake is hard to reverse. It fits companies building agentic products for customers and internal teams automating workflows where a single runaway agent could cause real damage. If you have shipped an agent and spent time worrying about what happens when it does something unexpected, TrustLoop is designed for that exact concern.
Where it stands apart is the focus on a hard boundary rather than soft guidance. The product does not try to make the agent smarter or steer its reasoning. It catches the output at the moment of execution and applies policy checks there. That separation means the control layer is not competing with the prompt for attention. It also means the audit trail reflects actual execution decisions rather than internal chain-of-thought artifacts that might or might not match what happened.
TrustLoop is open source under the Apache 2.0 license. There is no signup required to start using it, and no card is needed. Teams can clone the repository, run the Rust service, and integrate the SDK into their agent pipeline immediately. The project also offers a live demo at app.gettrustloop.app for teams who want to test the behavior before integrating, and booking links are available for deeper conversations with the maintainers.
Key Features
- Policy-first action interception
- Multi-language SDKs for TypeScript Python Rust
- Cryptographic decision receipts
- Self-hostable Rust runtime
- Spending cap enforcement
- Human approval workflow escalation
Pros & Cons
What we like
- Hard runtime boundary separate from agent prompt context
- Audit trail with cryptographic proof for compliance
- Open source and self-hostable for data residency
- Drop-in SDK wraps existing action dispatch
Room for improvement
- Requires wrapping every action dispatch point
- Policy definition adds upfront design work
- Younger project with a smaller community
- Documentation still maturing for complex policies
Frequently Asked Questions
What is TrustLoop?
Is TrustLoop free?
Who is TrustLoop for?
How is TrustLoop different from prompt-based guardrails?
Best For
Featured in
Alternatives to TrustLoop
View all
AgentSocial
A social network where the accounts are AI agents you connect over MCP

Almanac
A hosted, source-cited wiki that turns your files into context your AI agents can use
Mtok Market
Non-custodial spot market for AI inference tokens, settled in USDC on Base
n8n
Fair-code workflow automation with 400+ integrations
Reviews (7)
Genuinely impressed
Have been running TrustLoop for a while, here is where I land. It slotted into my routine without much fuss. Found it works best for rewriting outbound emails that violate policy. Worth it for what I get out of it.
It just works
TrustLoop has quietly become part of my daily flow. It handles the boring parts so I can focus on the work that matters. It fits well for blocking dangerous shell commands before execution. Hard to imagine going back to my old setup.
Worth a look
Three months of TrustLoop later, here is what holds up. What stands out is how little babysitting it needs. The defaults are sensible, so I was not fighting settings on day one. Easy yes for anyone weighing the same trade offs.
Pulled its weight from week one
TrustLoop has quietly become part of my daily flow. Where it really wins is human approval workflow escalation. Found it works best for rewriting outbound emails that violate policy.
Pulled its weight from week one
Have been running TrustLoop for a while, here is where I land. What stands out is how it handles self-hostable rust runtime. The defaults are sensible, so I was not fighting settings on day one. It earns its place in my stack.
Powerful once it clicks
Tried TrustLoop on a side project first, then rolled it out everywhere. Got real value out of self-hostable rust runtime. The thing I keep coming back to is how reliable it is. It would be a five if not for policy definition adds upfront design work. Glad I made the switch.
Pulled its weight from week one
Picked TrustLoop for the price, stayed for the quality. What stands out is how it handles cryptographic decision receipts. It just works, day after day, without surprises. Mostly using it for rewriting outbound emails that violate policy. Easy yes for anyone weighing the same trade offs.
Related Tools

LangChain
Open-source framework plus LangGraph and LangSmith for building, orchestrating, and observing LLM agents

Lindy
No-code AI agents that handle email, meetings, and recurring workflows

Wolli
Open framework for AI agents that grow around a purpose and extend themselves
n8n
Fair-code workflow automation with 400+ integrations